Demystifying Transmission Lines: What Are They? Why Are They Useful?

Introduction

Porous electrodes offer a high surface area to volume or weight ratio which is highly beneficial to a number of energy generation or storage devices. (e.g. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells, Super-Capacitors, Fuel Cells, etc). Transmission lines are heavily used in modeling in Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) experiments where porous systems are employed.

Though transmission lines are commonly used, an introductory paper was hard to find. This paper is intended to serve that purpose. It assumes basic knowledge of EIS and modeling using equivalent circuits as covered in our EIS application note.

Nomenclature and Notation

We will distinguish between the base electrode and the porous electrode and the various interfaces as shown in Figure 1.

Demystifying-Transmission-Lines.pdf.jpg

Figure 1. Porous Electrodes and the Nomenclature That Will Be Used in This Paper.

There are three regions that are of interest to the electrochemist. These are marked A, B, and Active Interface in Figure 1. A and B represent the interfaces between the base electrode and tip of the porous electrode with the electrolyte solution respectively. The active interface is the interface between the porous electrode and the electrolyte and this is the interface in question in most of the transmission line applications.

The base electrode and the porous electrode are electrically connected and generally based on the same material. For most systems, however, they behave sufficiently differently at the interface with the electrolyte that maintaining this distinction is useful.

Demystifying-Transmission-Lines.pdf 2.jpg

Figure 2. Transmission Line. base electrode and the porous electrode are electrically connected,repeating circuit blocks on the rails and the steps,ζ are the repeating circuit blocks on the rails and the steps. ZA and ZB correspond to impedances across the interfaces A and B defined in Figure 1.

A transmission line model in generic form is shown in Figure 2. ζ,A transmission line model in generic form ,subcomponents that can take various forms,ZA and ZB are defined as subcomponents that can take various forms. These may be as basic as single resistors and as complicated as necessary. basic as single resistors and as complicated as necessary,the solution impedance, bulk the impedance of the porous electrode material, and the impedance of the active interface, and ζ represent the solution impedance, bulk the impedance of the porous electrode material, and the impedance of the active interface respectively. We will refer to impedance of the porous electrode materialand step impedance using a ladder analogy as rail impedances and ζ as the step impedance using a ladder analogy. ZA and ZB are the impedances of the two interfaces A and B shown in Figure 1.

The parameter length of the transmission line represents the length of the transmission line (or the depth of the pore) as shown in Figure 2. It can be visualized as the number of steps in the ladder. Once the fitting is done, the numbers that are characteristic of the sample are the number of steps in the ladder,numbers that are characteristic of the sampleand defining the subcomponents. The value and the units of  a parallel combination of the components has to be decided on before the fitting is attempted and has to be locked to a particular value. We will assume generic equation governing the impedance of the entire line to be unitless for this paper to keep this discussion straightforward In practice, knowledge of the thickness L allows to determine important parameters such as the conductivity and diffusion coefficient from the impedance fit results.

When defining the subcomponents, we will use capital letters for components that do not repeat and lowercase letters for components that do. We will represent resistors with an R (or r) and constant phase elements with a Q (or q).The symbol “||” will be used to indicate a parallel combination of the components.

The generic equation governing the impedance of the entire line shown in Figure 2 is (from Bisquert,J.i):

Demystifying-Transmission-Lines.pdf 3.jpg(1)

Where Cλ= cosh(L/λ), Sλ = sinh(L/ λ) and λ = [ζ /(generic equation governing the impedance of the entire line+Bisquert,J.)]1/2 .

In the Echem Analyst

In the Echem Analyst, the circuit in Figure 3 is implemented with Echem Analyst≡r1 , ζ≡r3||q3, User Defined Components for EIS Modeling≡r2, ZA ≡RA||QA and ZB≡RB as shown in Figure 3 and named “Unified”. These blocks were implemented using the procedure described in our “User Defined Components for EIS Modeling” application note. They can easily be modified for specific needs and incorporated into the model. Detailed instructions can be found in our Technical Note regarding the “Implementation of Transmission Lines Using Generalized Circuit Blocks”.

Demystifying-Transmission-Lines.pdf 4.jpg

Figure 3. The Specific Model Implemented in Echem Analyst as "Unified". Where, Specific Model Implemented in Echem Analyst≡r1 , ζ≡r3||q3, adjusting the appropriate elements≡r2, ZA≡RA||QA and ZB≡RB.

Limiting cases can be easily achieved by adjusting the appropriate elements to be zero or very large. However, two models shown in Figure 4 are very commonly employed in the literature and are worthy of specific mention. Originally developed by Bisquert, J.iito model diffusion- recombination processes, they have been applied to dye-sensitized solar-cellsiii, supercapacitors and a number of other areas.

We will follow the notation assumed by Bisquert, J.Error: Reference source not found and use model diffusion- recombination processes≡0, ζ ≡ ζ m, impedance equationsimpedance equations , ZA ≡∞ and ZB≡∞ (Figure 4a) or ZB≡0 (Figure 4b). The impedance equations are:

Demystifying-Transmission-Lines.pdf 5.jpg(3)

In the Echem Analyst, these models are named “Bisquert Open (BTO)” (Eq. 3a) and “Bisquert Short (BTS)” (Eq. 3b) with conductivity of one rail is much larger than the other≡rm , ζ m≡rk||q. These models are very useful since it is typical to find in applications where the conductivity of one rail is much larger than the other one. These cases can be modeled well with one rail set to zero.

Demystifying-Transmission-Lines.pdf 6.jpg

Figure 4. Two Specific Cases Where Open Circuit or Short Circui is Shorted, ZA is Open Circuit and ZB is Either Open Circuit or Short Circuit, from Bisquert et. al.Error: Reference source not found These are defined as Bisquert Open (BTO) (a) and Bisquert Short (BTS) (b) in the Echem Analyst.

 Demystifying-Transmission-Lines.pdf 7.jpg

Figure 5. Two Models That Are Used to Fit the Capacitor Data in Figure 6. a) The transmission line model, b) R-CPE model.

Applications

UltraCapacitors

Ultracapacitors are currently being developed to generate strong energy bursts for a number of applications including uninterruptible power supplies, lasers, and power electronics for electric and hybrid vehicles. They provide a very high capacitance in a relatively small volume and weight utilizing porous materials that have very high specific surface areas.

Figure 6 shows the impedance spectra and the fits of a 5F capacitor1 at 0V DC and 1mV (rms) AC.

EIS Data of an Ultracapacitor

Figure 6. EIS Data of an Ultracapacitor and the Fits Using a Transmission Line and A Resistor and A Constant Phase Element in Parallel. The circuit models used are shown in Figure 6 and the fit results are shown in Table 1.

To fit the data we have tried the models shown in Figure 5. As seen in figure 6 the fit is excellent over the entire frequency range when the transmission line model is used and poor when R-CPE model is used. During the fit using the “Bisquert Open” model, parameter L was locked to 0.001 and Rk was locked to 1035Ω. These values have a gray background in table1. As the fit shows the R-CPE model misses a feature in the frequency range 10Hz-100Hz. The Yo value that comes out of the fit (after the L scaling described in the introduction) is 4.346 S s.0975 (notice S s1 would be F ).

Rs

0.0156

ohms

L

0.001

 

rm

22.06

ohm

rk

1035

ohm

ym

4346.00

S sa

a

0.975

 

L1

12.50

nH


Table 1. Fit Results for 5F Capacitor Using the Model Shown in Figure 6a. L and Rk were locked during the fit. Rk was chosen to simulate an open circuit.

Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Dye-Sensitized solar cells (DSC) are another application where transmission line models are regularly employed. Briefly, these are solar cells that utilize an organic or an organometallic dye molecule adsorbed on mesoporous TiO2 to absorb sunlight efficiently. The excited electrons are then extracted out through the TiO2. Again, the use of a porous electrode warrants the use of transmission lines.

The DSC Data and the Fit

Figure 7. The DSC Data and the Fit Using "Bisquert Open".

Figure 7 shows an impedance spectra of a DSC made using porous TiO2. The spectrum is fit using a “Bisquert Open” model and the fit is excellent over the entire frequency range. The fit results are summarized in Table 2.

Rs

26.27

ohm

L

1.00

 

rm

469.20

ohm

rk

1452.00

ohm

ym

1.84E-04

S sa

a

0.94

 

Table 2. Fit Results for DSC Impedance Spectra Shown in Figure7. Fit using a “Bisquert Open” and a resistor in series.

In certain types of DSCs where an organic hole conductor is used instead of a liquid electrolyte the region A is not insulating. The circuit model has to include a parallel resistance and constant phase element combination to account for region A as shown in Figure 7. This type of model is employed in the literature to model this and other types of DSCsiv.

Demystifying-Transmission-Lines.pdf 8.jpg

Figure 7. Circuit Model Describing a TiO2/Organic Conductor DSC. (TCO = Transparent Conducting Oxide)

QA and q3 denote the constant phase elements between the base electrode / electrolyte and the porous electrode / electrolyte, respectively. Notice base electrode / electrolyteis assumed to be short circuit and ZB is assumed to be open circuit. The data for this case is depicted in Figure 8.

Simulated Data for the Circuit

Figure 8. The Simulated Data for the Circuit Depicted in Figure 5. For r1= 106 Ω, r3=9.10-6 Ω, q3=5.103, a3=1, QA=10-2,aA=0.7, and RA takes four different values shown in the legend.

Though it is possible to generate the mathematical expressions for this and other particular cases (and it is done in the literature, see for example Bisquert, J. Error: Reference source not found), one can also use “Unified”(Figure 3) to fit this and other cases by adjusting the appropriate parameters to be zero or very large.

In order to employ Unified in fitting the data shown in figure 8 we need to force r2 to be a short circuit (i.e. r2=0 Ω) and RB to be an open circuit (i.e. RB→∞ or numerically RB should be much larger than any other relevant resistance in the fitting or the data). These values were locked during the fitting, and have a gray background in Table 2 and Table 3.

 

RA=0.1

RA=1

RA=10

RA=100

L

10-6

10-6

10-6

10-6

r1

106

106

106

106

r2

0

0

0

0

r3

9.19x10-6

9.07x10-6

9.07 x10-6

9.00 x10-6

Yo3

5.01x103

5.00 x103

5.02 x103

5.00 x103

a3

1

1

1

1

YoA

9.42x10-3

0.01

0.01

0.01

RA

0.0978

0.998

9.897

100.1

aA

0.717

0.700

0.699

0.700

RB

1035

1035

1035

1035

Table 3. The Fit Parameters for the Unified Model and the Four Data Sets Shown in Figure 6. The gray rows indicate the parameters that were locked during the fit. Notice r2 was locked to be a short circuit and RB was locked to open circuit. The top row corresponds to the legend of Figure 8.

Conclusion

Porous electrodes are regularly utilized for applications where a high surface area is beneficial. Impedance spectroscopy on porous materials regularly results in data that cannot be modeled with standard circuit components. Transmission lines are required due to the distributed nature of the interfacial impedance throughout the pore.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the data and very useful comments from Prof. Juan Bisquert and Dr. Francisco Fabregat-Santiago in the process of writing this paper.

1 ESHSR-0005C0-002R7 from Ness Capacitor , Gyeonggi-do, Korea

i Bisquert, J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2000,2, 4185-4192

ii Bisquert, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 325-333

iii Wang,Q.; Moser, J.-E.; Grätzel, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005,109,14945-19453

iv Fabregat-Santiago, F.; Bisquert, J.; Garcia-Belmonte, G.; Boschloo, G.; Hagfeldt, A. Sol. Ener. Mat. & Sol. Cells 2005,87, 117-131